top of page
SEP Essentials
Standard Essential Patents


IEEE Sanctions - the Huawei Vote Stuffing Scandal Part 2
This situation represents a major test for the IEEE SA processes — and ultimately whether the IEEE SA has the guts to appropriately discipline parties that violate the IEEE SA rules, potentially including Huawei as a company. It is far past time that the IEEE police itself, and the behavior of its participants.
Marta Beckwith
Dec 16, 20255 min read


The Huawei IEEE Scandal: Is Huawei a Buccaneer or a Privateer?
The IEEE is a consensus organization “dedicated to advancing technology for the benefit of humanity.” [1] And that is how Wi-Fi (IEEE 802.11) started: with a bunch of dreamers and idealists who wanted to create new technology to make everyone’s life easier. They worked under a set of rules that allowed every individual who came to enough meetings to vote on proposals and required that each of these individuals vote their conscience, rather than voting in a block to protect
Marta Beckwith
Dec 9, 20254 min read


A Vote to Be Allowed to Vote
On 27 April 2023, the European Commission published its proposal for the Regulation of Standard Essential Patents (“SEP Proposal”). The SEP Proposal was carefully considered and vetted through the European Union’s ordinary legislative procedures. Stakeholders and the public were given the opportunity to provide written input and there were more than 70 submissions from businesses, academics and other experts. It was also reviewed, and comments and suggestions made, by seve
Marta Beckwith
Dec 3, 20252 min read


The FRAND Commitment and Courts That Just Don’t Get It
The European Telecommunications Standards Institute (“ETSI”) requires each SEP owner to agree to give an “irrevocable undertaking in writing that it is prepared to grant irrevocable licences on fair, reasonable and non-discriminatory (“FRAND”) terms and conditions . . .” If a SEP owner refuses, the committee, in consultation with the ETSI Secretariat, is empowered to stop work on the applicable section of the standard. [1] Similarly, in the Institute of Electrical and Elec
Marta Beckwith
Oct 30, 20255 min read


Transparency, Transparency, Transparency
Those were the words on everyone’s lips at both IAM’s SEP Summit Global 2025 in London (“IAM’s Summit”) and at the Symposium on Standard Essential Patents hosted by the World Intellectual Property Organization (“WIPO”) in Geneva (“WIPO Symposium”). The Honorable Justice Mellor of the Chancery Division of the U.K. High Court put it most succinctly at IAM’s Summit: the biggest issue related to SEPs today is the lack of transparency. [1] On nearly every panel, nearly everyone,
Marta Beckwith
Oct 20, 20257 min read


The Coherent, the Meh and the Left Behind Part 1: China
I wanted to title this series of posts “The Good, the Bad and the Ugly” in a homage to the spaghetti Western’s conception of the American...
Marta Beckwith
Sep 23, 20257 min read


"Essentiality" and IoT - Guest Post by Graham Bell
I first met Graham Bell during the Innovatio MDL litigation. [1] Innovatio IP Ventures, LLC (Innovatio) had acquired patents from...
Marta Beckwith
Sep 18, 202516 min read


Licensing in the Real World - Secrecy vs Transparency
My recent post, Licensing in the Real World - A Primer on SEP License Agreements , discussed and showed examples of key licensing...
Marta Beckwith
Aug 19, 202511 min read


Licensing in the Real World - A Primer on SEP License Agreements
In my early days of licensing, I believed my company had a competitive advantage because of the provisions we had in our standard patent...
Marta Beckwith
Jul 31, 202515 min read
bottom of page
