

Jurisdiction No. 6 - India - Part 2
This post is the second to look at the emerging jurisdiction of India and its recent SEP related jurisprudence. My first post ( Jurisdiction No. 6 - India ( sepessentials.com ) ) reviewed the Delhi High Court’s decision in the SEP patent lawsuit filed by Telefonaktiebolaget LM Ericsson (“Ericsson) against Intex Technologies. To remind you, one of the bases for the lower court finding that Intex was, prima facie , an unwilling licensee was that Intex had “delayed” the procee
Marta Beckwith
Dec 18, 20235 min read


Jurisdiction No. 6 - India
In one of my previous posts, Answers to First Pop Quiz (sepessentials.com) , I reviewed the primary jurisdictions in which SEP cases usually are filed, what makes those jurisdictions popular (or unpopular) for cases filed by SEP holders or by implementers and why each of them is an outlier in its own way. Today, I’m taking a similar look at another emerging jurisdiction – India – and its recent SEP related jurisprudence. For years the conventional wisdom was that it was too
Marta Beckwith
Nov 30, 20235 min read

















