

We are Incapable of Making FRAND Determinations Say More UPC and German Judges
I recently attended the IPBC/IAM Live conference in Paris, where judges from both the Unified Patent Court (UPC) and a German court shared their perspectives on standard-essential patent (SEP) litigation. A consistent theme emerged from these discussions: neither the UPC nor Germany is equipped to make real FRAND (fair, reasonable, and non-discriminatory) determinations. Florence Butin, President of the Court of First Instance of the UPC and herself a UPC judge, noted that th
Marta Beckwith
Apr 144 min read


European Courts’ “Inconsistency” Will Not Be Solved by “Waiting and Seeing” – Case Study VoiceAgeEVS v. HMD
The European Commission (“EC”) Study focused on European Courts’ “inconsistency” in the application of the Directive on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights (“IPRED”) and advocated a “wait and see” “soft law” approach to solving the problem. See, "Inconsistency" - Europe Dithers Some More ). But, this “inconsistency” is not a failure to understand how to apply the IPRED properly but a willful refusal to follow it based on German and German-influenced Unified Pate
Marta Beckwith
Feb 266 min read


The EU Study – Europe Needs Concrete Solutions (Some are Proposed Here)
You can find my first post on the “Follow-up study on the application of the Directive on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights” (“ EC Study ”) here: "Inconsistency" - Europe Dithers Some More . I wanted to take another look at the EC Study since there is so much to unpack in its 132 pages (not to mention the multiple attachments). This post focuses on patent assertion entities (PAEs) and their relationship to other identified problems. The EC Study defines PAEs
Marta Beckwith
Feb 195 min read


"Inconsistency" - Europe Dithers Some More
The European Commission just released its “Follow-up study on the application of the Directive on the Enforcement of Intellectual Property Rights” (which you can find here: EC Study ) (“EC Study”). The Directive 2004/48/EC on the enforcement of intellectual property rights (“IPRED”) “established a framework of measures, procedures, and remedies for the civil enforcement of IP rights”. Among other reforms, it was intended to bring proportionality and balance to the conside
Marta Beckwith
Feb 45 min read


Europe Dithers While the United States Aims for “Global Dominance” and China Cements Its Status as the Only Country with a Coherent SEP Policy
2026 already has been a whirlwind of global activity, including in the world of standards and standard essential patents (SEPs). The United States has announced its intent “to win the global race for 6G” and obtain “scientific and technological global dominance” ( Global Dominance – The U.S.A.’s Views on Standards and SEPs ). China has further cemented its status as the only country in the world with a well-formulated and consistent strategy and vision around standards and S
Marta Beckwith
Jan 153 min read


A Vote to Be Allowed to Vote
On 27 April 2023, the European Commission published its proposal for the Regulation of Standard Essential Patents (“SEP Proposal”). The SEP Proposal was carefully considered and vetted through the European Union’s ordinary legislative procedures. Stakeholders and the public were given the opportunity to provide written input and there were more than 70 submissions from businesses, academics and other experts. It was also reviewed, and comments and suggestions made, by seve
Marta Beckwith
Dec 3, 20252 min read








